|
|
Post by Hey Hey You You On Sundays on Dec 10, 2006 17:34:18 GMT -5
You have to remember her people/record company submits the songs so it is their/her fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by paulmcsky on Dec 10, 2006 17:36:00 GMT -5
oh yeah for sure...i totally blame her label... what i tried to say is that this deserved a grammy but well she won too many with her crappy debut.
|
|
|
|
Post by duh5 on Dec 10, 2006 19:09:28 GMT -5
She can still submit it for the next Grammy's can't she?
|
|
|
|
Post by tozion on Dec 10, 2006 19:10:46 GMT -5
She can still submit it for the next Grammy's can't she? Only if she loses the Best Contemporary R&B Album award. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Hey You You On Sundays on Dec 10, 2006 19:11:57 GMT -5
If she wins for best contemp R&B album (which is almost certain) she can only submit it to the major catergories like song and record of the year and by next year it will be so old probably wouldn't stand a chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by duh5 on Dec 10, 2006 19:19:48 GMT -5
Well, although it peaked later, "Be Without You" came out late 2005. It's kind of a similar situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hey Hey You You On Sundays on Dec 10, 2006 19:22:15 GMT -5
Her misstep was sending Listen to pop when she should have sent Irreplaceable.
|
|
|
|
Post by duh5 on Dec 10, 2006 19:23:19 GMT -5
Her misstep was sending Listen to pop when she should have sent Irreplaceable. Definately a moronic move. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Hey You You On Sundays on Dec 10, 2006 19:27:50 GMT -5
Though since it is Yonka and company, they probably figured if they could get Listen nominated at the Grammys it would probably double over as promo for Dreamgirls/Oscar campaign.
|
|
|
|
Post by duh5 on Dec 10, 2006 19:32:54 GMT -5
They should have just submitted it to the best song from a motion picture category.
|
|
|
|
Post by sleepy eat pepper on Dec 10, 2006 19:34:15 GMT -5
They should have just submitted it to the best song from a motion picture category. |
|
|
|
Post by Hey Hey You You On Sundays on Dec 10, 2006 19:36:44 GMT -5
I think they were under the technicality of the soundstrack coming out past the deadline hence they couldn't since it was only on Beyonce's album at the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by backintime on Dec 11, 2006 18:43:10 GMT -5
Is it me or does she sound like K.Ro on the Spanish version?!
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Dec 11, 2006 20:23:22 GMT -5
"To the left to the left" is the 2006 "This sh*t is bananas"
|
|
rawr
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by rawr on Dec 11, 2006 21:34:03 GMT -5
198M audience. Amazing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bastian on Dec 12, 2006 12:20:45 GMT -5
interesting................... |
|
|
|
Post by paulmcsky on Dec 12, 2006 12:23:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by duh5 on Dec 12, 2006 12:42:37 GMT -5
Go Bee!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bastian on Dec 12, 2006 13:00:45 GMT -5
so 5 songs have now surpassed the 200million barrier? Usher - Yeah Mario - Let Me Love You Mariah - We Belong Together Mariah - Shake it Off and now Beyonce. |
|
|
|
Post by paulmcsky on Dec 12, 2006 13:03:50 GMT -5
This is the second Beyonce song to do that...COI was the first one... Mary J didn't cross the 200 M-mark with "Be without You"  shocking. |
|
|
|
Post by Bastian on Dec 12, 2006 13:14:26 GMT -5
This is the second Beyonce song to do that...COI was the first one... . I didn't know that. What a terrible song (CIL and BB are more deserving) |
|
|
|
Post by paulmcsky on Dec 12, 2006 13:16:24 GMT -5
well i'm not 100% sure about COI crossing the 200-m-mark...but i'm like 80% sure.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bastian on Dec 12, 2006 13:28:15 GMT -5
well i'm not 100% sure about COI crossing the 200-m-mark...but i'm like 80% sure. lol |
|
|
|
Post by paulmcsky on Dec 12, 2006 13:31:29 GMT -5
From Wikipedia:
On January 31, 2006 "Check on It" passed the 200 million audience impressions mark in the United States, according to Mediabase
|
|
|
|
Post by Bastian on Dec 12, 2006 13:35:27 GMT -5
From Wikipedia: On January 31, 2006 "Check on It" passed the 200 million audience impressions mark in the United States, according to Mediabase you didn't have to research it But thanks anyway ;D |
|
shocking.